Monday, October 10, 2016

Insanity - Killing America Over Harmless Laddish Banter

The declared intention of Barack Hussein Obama, the current President of the USA and titular leader of the so called free world, was to 'fundamentally transform' his country, but since his country was already the greatest and most prosperous nation in history, he could only have meant to fundamentally downgrade and destroy it.

As the American people go to the polls the disastrous consequences of the Obama 'fundamental transformation' should be kept uppermost in their minds. The export of America's industrial base and subsequent loss of jobs, the importation of cheap labour to hoover up whatever jobs are left, while importing criminal gangs, drug smugglers, Islamic terrorists, welfare colonists and an assortment of other anti-American riff raff from all corners of the backward uncivilized world.

They should bear in mind the trashing of America's image abroad and the subjugation of the President to foreign dictators and despots who despise America and all its works. These are the same dictators and despots who are financing the terrorists that are killing Americans in their own attempt to destroy the USA.

The Obama 'fundamental transformation' has deliberately divided the country along racial, religious and economic lines whereby income inequality applies only to those outside the exclusive circles inhabited by the corrupted rich and powerful.

The people's power guaranteed to them by their Constitution has been usurped by this corrupt criminal cabal who will not relinquish their iron grip under any circumstances.

The bought-and-paid-for, wholly owned and operated Democrat party candidate, Hillary Clinton, has promised to carry on with this fundamental transformation until traditional America is first downgraded then destroyed.

She will impose the exact same policies that are responsible for the the current destruction of Europe which includes unbalanced global trade agreements, open borders and the free movement of people.

If this isn't destructive enough she wants to increase the number of unvetted immigrants from Syria and the other middle east wars zones she helped to create by 500% and give amnesty to some 13 million illegal immigrants, all in her first 100 days in office.

The resultant demographic shift will be irreversible and it will ensure there will never be a Republican or conservative government ever again. For all intents and purposes the USA will become a one party state just like the rest of the undeveloped, uncivilized world.

A Clinton administration will appoint three or possibly four Supreme Court judges for lifetime terms which will result in the abandonment of the Constitution, the instrument that guarantees the liberties of all Americans and which facilitated its greatness.

Add into this toxic mix the tax, spend, borrow and debt policies so beloved of Democrats and socialists around the world and it's game over.

Love him or loathe him, and flawed as he may be, the only threat to the Clinton led criminal cabal and the subsequent nightmare scenario is billionaire businessman and Republican candidate, Donald Trump.

He's no saint nor does he pretend to be, what you see is what you get; an anti-establishment patriot who, like millions of his fellow Americans, is dismayed at the wanton destruction of his country by a corrupt, agenda driven self serving cartel of power hungry crooks. He has been honest and outspoken about his intention to make America great again by confronting head-on and ending the iron grip on power of the corrupt establishment and returning this power back to it's rightful owners, i.e the American people.

From the start of his campaign Trump has been criticized for his tone and his politically incorrect language, the same language that is resonating with the silent majority of the American people who, like their British counterparts, have been silenced by the same overbearing, rigidly policed regime of political correctness.

The popularity and ascendancy of Donald Trump has put the fear of God into the Clinton led criminal cabal and the corrupt establishment like never before.  They can see their hold on power being forced from their grasp and they will do everything in their power to stop him and destroy his campaign.

This latest manufactured media blitz to topple Trump and destroy his candidacy is so obviously contrived it's not just embarrassing, it's downright pathetic. The phony outrage at some laddish remarks made in jest over a decade ago and the attempt to use them as an indication of misogyny is truly desperate stuff and pale in comparison to the language used by former Presidents and other political aspirants.

Actions speak louder than words but the appalling mistreatment of women by John, Robert and Edward Kennedy, although legendary, is being downplayed or ignored as is the predatory behavior of Bill Clinton.

Almost the entire political class give moral equivalence to Islam, the most misogynistic and violent cults on the planet and not only invite them into the country but actually force the American people to accept some of their barbaric practices under threat of prosecution if they object or voice a disapproving opinion.

Hillary Clinton and her dodgy Foundation accept tens of millions of dollars from some of the most misogynistic regimes on the planet including medieval Saudi Arabia where punishments for women include public flogging, facial disfigurement, beheading and stoning to death.

Early indications are that the sensible American public are treating this manufactured media storm and it's subsequent howls of phony outrage with the contempt it deserves and maintaining their faith in the only candidate that is prepared to take on the corrupt establishment and halt the destruction of their beloved country.


Friday, October 7, 2016

Progressives Are Using Mass Immigration To Destroy America

The disastrous and bloody consequences of opening the borders to mass immigration from the third world into western democracies is there for all to see. The rape, murder and violent criminal activities being visited upon the law abiding citizens of the host nations is the visible aspect of the disaster but the less visible aspect should give equal cause for concern.

The incompatibility and the declared refusal of some immigrants to integrate along with their continual demands that the host nations give up their long established Judeo-Christian heritage and cultural practices to accept alien and often barbaric ones has had the effect of degrading the very fabric of the developed nation states.

A borderless world with free movement of people anywhere and everywhere, and the subsequent degradation of western civilization, is the declared intention of the UN/EU global political elite and judging by the actions of their surrogates in the national legislatures they are determined to make it happen.

Since no one in their right mind would emigrate from the prosperous developed nations to the more poor and uncivilized corners of the world, mass immigration is always going to be one way traffic until the host nation resembles the ones that were left behind.

The existence and unrestrained proliferation of welfare financed, mono-cultural ghettos in towns and cities across the western world are a clear demonstration of this fact. Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, The Netherlands etc. are examples of entire countries that have degraded beyond recognition from a decade or so ago. (See here)

The global political elite are so determined to effect the destruction of America and western civilization they not only frame legislation in favour of the incomers and against their own citizens, they also use every insult in their playbook to demonize and smear anyone who even questions their agenda.

The most familiar slogan used by this elite whenever anyone suggests even minor restrictions to mass third world immigration is "this is not who we are", quickly followed by the "we are a nation of immigrants" soundbite. This piece of spin is usually accompanied by a potted family history of how the advocates' grandfather or other ambitious ancestors made the perilous journey across continents and oceans to breathe the fresh air of freedom and fulfill their dreams of prosperity.

While the elites and their media whores indulge in spin and propaganda from their ivory towers and exclusive gated communities, the disenfranchised people are watching helplessly as their countries are being degraded before their very eyes. The fresh air of freedom is being replaced by an unwholesome stench of socialism and dreams of prosperity are disappearing into a nightmare of financial struggle, misery and prospective poverty.

We've heard the familiar refrain about 'who we are' from a variety of western political leaders, including President Obama and his First Lady Michelle. We've heard similar nonsense from the disgraced British Prime Minister, David Cameron, we've also heard it from his replacement, Theresa May, Australian Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Incidentally, in Great Britain the metropolitan elites and career politicians also spin about the country having a proud tradition of giving sanctuary and asylum to those fleeing war, pestilence and oppression. This may true for genuine victims of catastrophe but the phony compassion for every global waif and stray is not shared by those struggling to make ends meet and survive in the decayed industrial heartlands, the abandoned coalfields and the decimated commercial fisheries or those displaced and disenfranchised by economic migrants and welfare colonists in the urban population centres.

One would have thought that these manufactured politicians are the last people on earth to be telling people 'who they are' especially when they are quite capable of deciding that for themselves. The history of immigration into the USA and related legislation tells an entirely different story from the one being spun as fact by the agenda driven political elite.

The truth about 'who we are' and 'the nation of immigrants' fabrication is that immigration from outside Western Europe was strictly controlled in the USA from the 17th century right up until the 1960's.

The Naturalization Law of 1790 restricted naturalization to 'free white persons'; this crude looking law was continually amended to be more inclusive as the new nation evolved. These amendments were structured to ensure that the quality of immigrants and their compatibility would benefit the emerging nation and continue its upward path to prosperity.

The Page Act of 1875 was the first immigration law which prohibited the entry of any immigrant deemed 'undesirable', specifically those from Asia. In 1882 came the self explanatory Chinese Exclusion Act which was not repealed until 1942.

A surge in immigration in the early 20th century prompted Congress to pass the Emergency Quota Act and the 1924 Immigration Act which aimed at restricting immigration from South and Eastern Europe and prohibited immigration from Asia entirely.

If any law defines who Americans are and confirms that they did not become the greatest nation on earth by a massive influx of third world migrants was the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. This Act organized all previous immigration laws and statutes into one body. It retained quota systems for nationalities and regions based on skills, moral character and potential for integration and assimilation.

The intention of the Act was not racial superiority or any other racist motive but to prevent the very degradation and destruction that the 'fundamental transformation' of America was designed to achieve and what we are currently witnessing at this moment in history.

The Act was sponsored by two Democrats, Senator Pat McCarran and Representative Francis Walter in the days when Congressmen from all parties were patriots first, who's main concern was the well being of America, not some perverted 19th century ideology.

Senator McCarran's defence of the Immigration and Nationality Act before the Senate in March 1953 is an eloquent description of just who Americans are and lays to rest the nation of immigrants spin so beloved of those who have committed themselves to destroying that shining city on a hill.

"I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world should be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors, ...However we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. ... I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nations downfall than any other group since we have achieved our independence as a nation".

In conclusion, all the protections put in place by previous legislators to preserve American civilization and by extension its greatness and global leadership, were systematically dismantled by a treacherous political class from both parties beginning with the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act sponsored by Senator Ted Kennedy.

This Act abolished national origin quotas and numerical caps opening the floodgates to incompatible third world immigrants and this, along with amnesties for illegals, has changed the ethnic make-up of the United States and began the on-going descent from greatness to eventual third world mediocrity.    

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

On The Precipice - Socialism For The 21st Century Has Arrived

As the Presidential campaign in the USA enters the final furlong with the winning post in sight the American people will have to decide on a new leader after being subjected to an eighteen month torrent of lies and half truths, claims and counter claims along with personal insults of unprecedented ferocity.

When all is said and done the choice they will have on election day is stark and crystal clear. Do they want to continue with the American dream of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness in a free enterprise system with constitutionally limited government or the nightmare of a downgraded, mediocre backwater ruled permanently by big government tax and spend socialists dedicated to the UN globalists agenda?

To help the American people decide, and to dispel any accusations of exaggeration, I would encourage them to take note of the latest developments from Great Britain concerning the Labour Party and it's vision for the future. I would also encourage them to note the comparison with the Clinton/Obama Democrat agenda and their vision for the future of the USA.

The Labour Party are the second largest party in the Westminster parliament and consequently in a very powerful position that, depending on the performance of the current administration, could very well form the next government of Great Britain.

This once noble and well intentioned political party always considered itself to be a broad church encompassing all shades of opinion from the centre ground to the far-left. After a silent and meticulously planned coup by the far-left this is no longer the case.

Some of the party faithful along with planted extremists from the far-left have elected the life long communist Jeremy Corbyn as it's new leader who in turn has installed a fellow communist, Jim McDonnell as his Shadow Chancellor. Both these men are ideological disciples of Marx, Lenin and Chairman Mao but they are pale in comparison to their recently appointed Executive Director of Strategy and Communications, Seamus Milne.

Milne is an unapologetic disciple of Josef Stalin. Yes that's the same Josef Stalin that murdered some 50 million of his own citizens in the name of his communist ideology.

With this new leadership firmly entrenched they have now announced their intention to achieve power and deliver 'socialism of the 21st century' to the British people. (See here)

Bernie Sanders aside, leading socialists and communists in America are not quite so overt as their British counterparts, choosing instead to clothe their party, along with their ideology and agenda, with more PR friendly terms such as 'Liberal' and 'Progressive' or as Hillary Clinton refers to herself, 'Progressive Democrat'.

Whatever fancy titles they give themselves it's their agenda and malign intentions that expose them for what they really are.

Compare the attitudes and policies of Clinton/Obama and the Democrats with those of Corbyn/McDonnell and the Labour party then note the similarities.

Corbyn and McDonnell loathe Great Britain, it's history and it's culture; to that end they support open border, mass immigration from the third world. They have put no limit on numbers despite the shortage of housing, jobs, school places, health care provision and money.

They are globalists who are committed to a borderless world governed by a UN based political elite.

They smear anyone who questions this destructive policy as racists, bigots, xenophobes or Fascist.

They are committed to the Islamification of Great Britain and promote the religious, cultural and moral equivalence of this incompatible and obviously backward death cult as practiced by the majority of Muslims. The declared intention of radical Muslim terrorists to commit mass murder is being studiously ignored with victims being considered as collateral damage in the great cultural replacement crusade.

As with mass immigration they smear anyone who questions this cultural destruction as Islamophobes or intolerant far-right nationalists.

In typical socialist fashion, and despite the unsustainable national debt, they intend to embark on a spending binge of unprecedented proportions; this will include the usual wet dream items such as increasing the minimum wage to an unaffordable ten pounds per hour, expanding the hated foreign aid budget, and extending welfare benefit entitlements to every adult in the country.

(Hillary Clinton and the Democrats have not gone as far as extending welfare benefits to everyone just yet but socialists have a history of following precedents so it may well come in the future)

Corbyn and the Labour party want a National Education Service which will be funded by levies on businesses which, if the current state education system is anything to go by, will be nothing more than a brainwashing operation delivering government propaganda to young impressionable minds.

They intend to borrow a mind boggling half trillion pounds (500 billion) to start up a centrally controlled National Investment Bank which will finance, among other things, the nationalization of the railways and other key industries. They have also promised to built a million new homes and impose a total ban on fracking.

(Read about the insanity here)

They plan to pump endless more millions into the failed National Health Service (known in the USA as socialized medicine). Constructed for conditions in postwar Great Britain, the unreformed NHS has grown into an inefficient monolithic bureaucracy that is a black hole for taxpayer money and no longer fit for purpose.

The Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, was planned as a stepping stone to a single payer system which will use the NHS as a blueprint.

They intend to increase the wages of public sector workers without any kind of reform or increases in efficiency or productivity.

There are other areas of massive unfunded spending such as combating climate change and continued payments to the EU for access to their overrated single market so this list of items is by no means complete.

They plan to raise the money by 'asking everyone to pay a little more in taxes' including an increase in the top rate to 50%, increased taxes on businesses, an increase in corporation tax and an increase in borrowing. If this isn't enough, and it won't be, they plan to fire up the presses and print the money.

It doesn't take an avid researcher to discover that this 'socialism of the 21st century' is nothing new since the ideology doesn't change from one century to another.

These are the same economy wrecking policies that failed in the 19th and 20th centuries. The railways along with every other key industry were nationalized by the 1947 Labour government and subsequently failed.

A National Enterprise Board was put in place by the Harold Wilson Labour government in the 1970's and also failed. Whole sectors of Great Britain's once formidable industrial base were either decimated or disappeared entirely.

The state comprehensive education system put in place by the same Wilson government in the late 1960's failed to such an extent that basic educational standards have plummeted and upward mobility for the least well off has ceased.

Socialism in 20th century Great Britain resulted in industrial decline, record unemployment, poverty, misery and the ignominy of a British Chancellor of the Exchequer grovelling cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund for loan to bail out the bankrupt economy.

One cannot fail to mention that Jeremy Corbyn and his acolytes were enthusiastic supporters of the Hugo Chavez socialist revolution in Venezuela but never mention that sad and sorry country as an example of 21st century socialism. In fact they never mention it all since it's fall into poverty, misery and violent unrest.

In conclusion, I would humbly suggest that the American electorate ignore the appalling mainstream media whores and look at the damage that 20th century socialism has done to Great Britain and the further damage that it's 21st century offspring will do in the future should Corbyn and his comrades ever secure power.

These are the same policies that the Clinton/Obama Democrats want to impose on the American people which will be equally disastrous for them as it was for the British.

Friday, September 16, 2016

EU Leader Uses The Race Card But Fails To Mention Immigrant Crime

When one of the five un-elected presidents of Europe, Jean-Claude Junker, made his risible annual 'state of the Union address' to the phony European Parliament he used the occasion to vent his anger by denigrating and smearing the British people as racist and xenophobic.

President Junker cuts a rather sad figure these days as his beloved EU nation building project implodes and descends into economic collapse, chaos and civil war just like all centrally controlled autocracies always do.

He still cannot come to terms with the fact that the British people voted to reject government by him and his army of faceless bureaucrats, choosing instead to regain their sovereignty and become a self governing nation once again.

Led by the increasingly unstable German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, Junker and the other four presidents, continue to dictate the terms of the Brexit process and the future relationship between the EU and an independent Great Britain. They are assuming that the EU in it's present form will still be in existence by the end of the two year process but I digress.

In his 'state of the Union' speech Junker used the unfortunate murder of a Polish immigrant to paint the post referendum Great Britain as a hive of racists who indiscriminately attack foreigners just for the hell of it and also to issue a veiled threat of future action if this non existent racism persists after Brexit.

This raises several important issues that not only expose Junker for the charlatan that he is, it also exposes the false narrative created by the vast EU propaganda machine he uses to justify his denigration and smears.

Mr. Junker declared that "Europeans can never, never accept Polish workers being harassed, beaten up or even murdered on the streets of Essex" ignoring the fact that a single homogeneous population of Europeans does not exist.

He went on to add that "the free movement of workers is as much a common European value as our fight against discrimination and racism". Again he ignored the fact that Great Britain will be an independent nation and not part of his EU and as a consequence they will not share his fictitious 'common European values'. (See here)

As mentioned earlier, Junker uses the unfortunate murder of a single Polish immigrant as an excuse to use the race card and smear the British people as racists and xenophobes who indiscriminately attack innocent Polish workers.

Typical of all agenda driven European autocrats he deliberately fails to tell the full story by omitting to mention the horrendous crimes committed by Polish immigrants on innocent Britons going about their lawful business in their own country.

In light of this allow me to submit some facts to a candid world that Jean-Claude Junker fails to mention.

A Polish thug beat up two NHS workers despite a judges' order that he be deported the year previously (See here)

A Polish thug beats a man with learning difficulties senseless and drags him into the road in front of a bus. (See here)

A British hero returns home from fighting in Iraq only to be beaten up by Polish thugs. (See here)

A Gang who battered a dad in his home in front of his family were convicted Polish thugs. (See here)

As an indication of the the problem of criminal Poles in Great Britain, they top EU crime figures. (See here)

Due to Junker's sacrosanct free movement of people madness, which he touts as a 'common European value', Great Britain's prisons have seen a shocking 240% rise in EU convicts. Apart from the horrendous price paid by the victims these criminals cost the British taxpayers $210 million last year.

With his enormous taxpayer funded salary and a raft of other expenses Junker is able to isolate himself and his family in his ivory tower far away from the consequences of the free movement of people madness which causes so much pain and suffering to innocent British victims.

The British people could care less what behavior this lying charlatan will or will not tolerate in their own country; he would do well to cease with the denigration and smears and accept that the British people have voted to be an independent and sovereign nation instead of a vassal state in his crumbling empire.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Foreign Aid Fat Cats Are Financing Corruption With Taxpayers Money

The species of humans known as niche professionals are attracted to taxpayer money like vultures are attracted to a carcass, especially when that supply of taxpayers money is endless.

As a warning to the American people, the much vaunted National Health Service - the NHS or socialized medicine - is packed to the rafters with so called 'health care professionals' who are stuffing their pockets and bank accounts out of the endless billions that is pumped into the sclerotic monolith annually.

These fat cats are career bureaucrats who are immune from sanction regardless of their performance and more importantly, regardless of how many people die needlessly every year while in their care.

Foreign aid is another industry which provides an opportunity for fat cats to get rich by looting the public treasury regardless of performance or value for money or lives saved.

The new International Development Secretary, Priti Patel, has revealed what we all knew already - that 'foreign aid professionals' have created an operation that rakes in billions from a budget that is not set by need or any humanitarian crisis but to meet an arbitrary target set by the United Nations. (See here)

One of the biggest flocks of foreign aid vultures can be found in the European Union who manage to skim around $16 billion out of $33 billion every year. That's $16 billion that disappears into the pockets of the fat cats instead of the bellies of the hungry.

Examples abound of taxpayers money being used to finance corruption instead of alleviating poverty or improving the lives of the less fortunate so to keep it brief I will limit this discourse to four.

The president of the dirt poor African country of Malawi, Peter Muthrika, where more than half of the population live on less than $1 per day is wanting an Air Force One style presidential jet to avoid airport queues and the inconvenience of waiting for flights. (See here)

The president-for-life of the dirt poor famine ravaged African country of Uganda, Yoweri Museveni, diverted $42 million of development aid money on a top of the range private jet. (See here)

Meanwhile, a self taught Malawian teenager, William Kamkwamba, has transformed his poverty stricken village by building windmills out of junk to supply electricity and pump water. William had to quit school because his family of fourteen could no longer afford the $80 per year school fees.

His efforts have even attracted the attention of jet setting carbon billionaire, Al Gore, who lauded William's work with wind energy because it helps with the manufactured climate crisis we supposedly face. Being the charlatan that he is Al Gore jumped on the bandwagon to promote his money making climate scam without considering that it was poverty and starvation that motivated William not melting glaciers or polar bears. (See here)

I feel it my humanitarian duty to offer a solution absolutely free of any charges or expenses. They could use some of the money that is being purloined by EU bureaucrats, fat cat foreign aid professionals and corrupt dictators to pay for William's school fees and those of others, and supply the materials to build windmills.

If Al Gore is serious he can stop his jet setting ways and donate some of his billions to projects that do something tangible to alleviate the condition of poor Africans.

Elsewhere in Africa some genius somewhere has invented the Hippo Roller, a device that increases the amount of water that villagers can transport from the water source to their village making neck and back problems a thing of the past.. Prior to this, women - it's their job to fetch water - would carry a heavy urn of water on their heads for miles several times a day. (See here)

It's most likely a 'foreign aid professional' paid himself and his army of consultants a hefty bonus for thinking that one up. But alas at $35 per roller they are out of reach for many rural Africans who need them the most.

 As with William Kamkwamba's windmills the politicians and the foreign aid professionals could use some of their filthy lucre to finance Hippo Rollers for rural Africans. Better still, they should do the obvious and use some of that loot to install a water pipe from the source to the village. That would save the necks, backs and legs of the ladies from injury and leave them more time to work in the fields, cook, clean and raise their children.

The fact is there has been trillions pumped into African countries since they gained their independence over half a century ago to no avail. It's no coincidence that corrupt African dictators and their cronies have become fabulously wealthy while their citizens have been left in poverty and to endure one humanitarian crisis after another.

It's also a fact that if the people of aid supported Africa were to become prosperous and render foreign aid obsolete the industry that has built up around it would also become obsolete.

The politicians along with the fat cats and corrupt African dictators are not going to let that happen and lose such a lucrative career. These appalling people have no emotions or conscience, they would rather the world's poor remain poor in order that they can keep funding their lavish lifestyles to which they have become accustomed.

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

There Has Never Been A Better Time To Be A Socialist

It's become an accepted fact that people who refer to themselves as socialists have the unenviable ability to navigate the wide and crooked path through life with their heads firmly embedded up their nether regions. They are so blind to the obvious it's a wonder they can get out of bed in the morning without walking into the wall.

Regardless of all the evidence around them they persist in trying to justify their perverted ideology as if the world and history are flush with successful socialist states instead of failed poverty stricken tyrannies.

They are unable to acknowledge that the United Soviet of Socialist Republics collapsed due to the inability of state appointed career bureaucrats and party apparatchiks to control economic activity and the markets let alone control human nature and prevent the inherent need to be free.

They are unable to acknowledge that China, North Korea, Zimbabwe and latterly Venezuela, among others, are humanitarian disaster areas because of the imposition of socialist economic policies.

In a rambling, disjointed article in the online forum LabourList, one useful idiot from the British Labour Party demonstrates where his particular head is located by writing "there has never been a better time to be a socialist, because the answers to problems right now are socialist answers. The free market is not providing a solution because it is part of the problem". (See here)

One of the problems he is referring to is the mass immigration disaster whereby millions of third world economic migrants are competing for the jobs of British working people. He failed to mention however that these same economic migrants are also competing for housing, education and health care. They are also given other 'free stuff', including cash benefits which are a further incentive and sucking the taxpayer dry.

He argues that walls and fences won't stop the deluge of economic migrants while the labour market remains unregulated. He is obviously too dumb to realize the correlation between free markets and job creation. He is also not smart enough to realize that job creation increases opportunity for working people and increases the potential for future prosperity.

The American people were recently exposed to what their British cousins have been experiencing for generations when Democratic Presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, hit the campaign trail as a socialist. As a red herring he referred to himself as a 'democratic socialist' but as we know from history the words 'democratic' and 'socialist' are incompatible and cannot be used to compliment each other.

Sanders went through the entire campaign without once referring to the Soviet Union or the other countries mentioned above and he avoided the word 'Venezuela' like the plague because that particular country was sinking into the abyss of poverty, misery and bloodshed due the very ideology and policies he was selling to the American people.

The socialist policies advocated by Sanders are no different to the policies advocated by the eventual Democratic Party nominee, Hillary Clinton, although she avoids using the 'S' world preferring instead to label herself as a 'progressive' in an attempt to disassociate herself from the bloody history of her ideology.

Writing on LabourList pre-Brexit,  a fellow comrade of the party - she really does use the term 'comrade' - going by the name of Chi Onwurah, labels herself as a true internationalist and as a committed Europhile  she saw a 'progressive' European Union as a natural first step towards a Global Socialist State.

She goes on to add that she is not expecting the Global Socialist State any time soon so she will settle for a British one. (See here)

Like the other advocates, she never mentions the Soviet Union, North Korea, Zimbabwe or Venezuela, which was joining the others into the abyss at the very moment they were all on the campaign trail advocating the very same destructive socialist policies.

The sad thing is that there doesn't appear to be anything that can be done to help these people understand the realities of their ideology or to extract their craniums from their colons. Here is a link to twenty quotes on socialism that might help them to understand their folly.

History teaches us that the politicians who advocate socialism never have to suffer the consequences of the disaster they impose on others. They enjoy the wealth and life style of the class they claim to hate and who's eradication they work so hard to bring about.

The sad thing about the deluded ideologues on both sides of the Atlantic, and across the world for that matter, is they have unlimited funding from malevolent power brokers and millions of dedicated followers that could be persuaded to put them into power, in which case may the Lord have mercy on us all.

Monday, September 12, 2016

Eid Greetings - Prime Ministers And Presidents Don't Speak For The People

It has become a custom in the civilized world for the various leaders to send fawning greetings to their respective Muslim communities to mark one festival or another. These greetings include undeserved, sentimental flattery about their contribution to society and paint a picture of peaceful tolerance and co-existence that is at odds reality.

Unelected British Prime Minister, Theresa May, used the occasion of Eid al Adha to give one such reality defying address, the content of which was so sickly and the delivery so cringe worthy it's painful to watch. (See it here)

Due to the culture of imposed political correctness and intimidation the British people keep their council and do not voice their opinions on Islamification overtly. Covertly it is blatantly obvious that the Prime Minister does not speak for the majority of the British people nor do they share her sentiments.

Since the American, Canadian and Australian people are suffering the same destructive and bloody consequences of the Muslim global agenda, President Obama, Prime Minister Trudeau and Prime Minister Turnbull are not speaking for their respective peoples either when they gave their fawning Eid greetings. (See here, here and here)

The truth is that the majority of Muslims hate the western democracies along with their cultures, practices and ways of life, preferring instead to live under barbaric sharia law.

Muslims believe the contents of the Koran and follow the same prophet, Mohammad, so it stands to reason that those that kill in the name of Allah in order to dominate the world are the true followers of Islam while those so called 'moderate Muslims' are committing heresy by not following suit.

The questions that the British people would like addressed by the Muslim community, and Mrs. May, are these; if you hate their culture, practices and their way of life why do you choose Great Britain to migrate into? To those who are born in Great Britain but hate the culture and reject the way of life why do you stay and not emigrate to a country that shares your religion, your culture and tolerate your practices? The same questions apply to America, Canada and Australia.

When all things are considered, Islam and Muslims are not compatible with Great Britain's culture, customs or way of life. The following are just a small sample of the reasons why.

The Muslim community are offended by the fact that the British people eat pork and pork products. Sausages, bacon, black pudding etc. is the traditional British breakfast but Muslims are refusing to handle these products even if it's in their job description to do so because they are supposedly unclean.

A full English breakfast is even more delicious after an evening down the pub where the British people partake of that other ancient custom of drinking a skinful of beer or other alcoholic concoctions.

It's more than just a traditional form of recreation, the British pub is woven into the very fabric of every village, town and city. Those places where the local population have not been displaced that is. Muslims have put booze in the same category as pork and are refusing to handle that also.

British women are liberated and free to make their own choices on every aspect of their lives, this includes choosing the bikini as their preferred attire when visiting the beach. This may not be acceptable to Muslims but it is most definitely not an invitation to sexual assault or rape.

The way that Muslim men treat their women is grossly offensive to the British people but that reality doesn't influence Mrs. May or the political class who label such opinions as 'racist' and 'Islamophobic' They excuse the appalling misogyny that is inherent in Islam by claiming that it's 'cultural enrichment'.

The British people are known as a nation of dog lovers who refer to these lovable creatures as 'man's best friend'. This is in stark contrast to the cruelty they suffer at the hands of cold hearted Muslim dog haters who obviously derive great pleasure from their torture.

In addition to all of this, British parents do not marry off their pre-pubescent daughters to adult relatives such as uncles or cousins. They do not indulge in paedophilia, female genital mutilation, honour killings or public self flagellation in the name of their God.

They do not behead people who do not share their belief systems or seek to subjugate the entire planet under the cruel, uncivilized sharia law.

In conclusion, it's worth stating that Mrs. May is an Islam reality denier who is on record as saying that many Britons would benefit 'greatly' from barbaric sharia law. She is also want to repeat the favourite soundbites of the global political elite such as "Islam is a great global religion of peace" and in tandem with the other western leaders she excuses the bloodshed and barbarity by repeating ad nauseum that "it's nothing to do with Islam" after every Muslim atrocity. (See here)

The fact that Mrs. May made her insensitive and offensive Eid address on the fifteenth anniversary of the September 11th attack on the World Trade Centre, New York, where Muslims murdered almost three thousand innocent Americans in the name of Allah  proves beyond doubt that she is as committed to the Islamification of the western world as Obama, Trudeau and Turnbull as instructed by their UN masters.